Should We Obey The Law Today?
Spoken Gospel podcast with a photo of David and Seth

Should We Obey The Law Today?

About This Episode

What is the law? Should we observe the Sabbath? Why don't we celebrate Passover? Why do we still obey sexual laws, but not laws about farming? Seth and David explore these questions and more in an attempt to answer the question, "How do we apply the Old Testament law to Christians today?"

Text Link

Should We Obey the Law Today? Understanding How Old Testament Law Applies to Christians

Show Notes

David Bowden and Seth Stewart sit down for a candid and wide-ranging conversation about one of the most enduring and difficult questions in biblical theology: how does the Old Testament law apply to followers of Jesus today? Before diving into the specific laws found in the latter half of Leviticus, they pause to lay important groundwork, acknowledging that this is a question scholars continue to wrestle with and that they themselves are still processing. They point listeners toward resources from the Bible Project and Tim Mackie as additional study aids, while making clear that the goal of the episode is not to offer a definitive answer but to help listeners think through common assumptions and find a better path forward.

Ancient Law Is Not Modern Law

One of the most important shifts the episode calls for is rethinking what "law" even means. In our modern, Western context, law refers to written statutes ratified by a governing body, enforced in courts, and applied to the letter. Lawyers find loopholes, defendants are acquitted on technicalities, and the written code is the final word. But for the majority of human history, law did not function this way. Ancient law codes like the Code of Hammurabi were widely known and copied, yet thousands of court documents from the Babylonian Empire never cite that law code to justify a legal ruling. The same pattern appears in the Old Testament itself. When the prophet Jeremiah was accused of blasphemy and treason for announcing the temple's destruction, he did not quote the Torah in his defense. Instead, he appealed to the precedent of the prophet Micah, who said a similar thing and was not prosecuted.

This means the binding authority behind an ancient law code was not the written statute itself but the power and character of the authority behind it. For the people of Israel, that authority was Yahweh. What they were looking for in the law was not a list of loopholes and technicalities but a window into God's character and will. This distinction explains why the law could shift in its specifics without contradicting itself. During the Passover in Exodus, God commanded the lamb to be roasted and not boiled, likely because the urgency of their flight from Egypt demanded speed. By the time Deuteronomy was written, the people were in a different situation, and God permitted boiling. If you treat the law as a modern statutory code, that looks like a contradiction. If you understand it as an expression of God's unchanging character applied to a changing situation, it makes perfect sense. God's salvation was coming quickly in Egypt, and the meal needed to reflect that urgency. The character of God remained constant. The expression of that character shifted with the circumstances.

Why the Threefold Division Falls Short

The most common framework many Christians have been taught for applying the Old Testament law is the threefold division: moral laws, civil laws, and ceremonial laws. Under this model, ceremonial laws were fulfilled by Jesus in his death, burial, and resurrection. Civil laws applied only to Israel as a geopolitical nation and no longer bind the multinational church. What remains binding are the moral laws, things like the 10 Commandments. It sounds clean and simple, which is precisely why it is so popular. But the Bible itself never makes this distinction. Neither the Old Testament nor the New Testament separates the law into three categories or treats one category as expendable and another as permanent.

The problems with this framework become clear quickly. Many civil laws are grounded in moral principles. The command to build parapets on your roof is a civil regulation, but it flows directly from the moral command to love your neighbor. If you are obligated to obey the moral law, you are, by extension, obligated to care about the safety of others in your home. Which category does the Sabbath fall into? It is moral, woven into the creation account. It is ceremonial, central to Israel's worship rhythms. It is civil, regulating society's weekly schedule. It is impossible to assign it to just one category, which is precisely why Jesus made the Sabbath a centerpiece of his teaching about the law's true meaning. In the New Testament, Paul quotes what would be classified as a "civil" law about not muzzling an ox while it treads grain and applies it directly to paying church workers (1 Corinthians 9:9). He does not pause to reclassify it or explain why a civil law still applies. He simply treats the law as a unified whole that reveals something true about God's character.

The Deep Continuity Between Old and New Covenants

Rather than asking how different the old covenant is from the new, the episode argues that the key to understanding the law's ongoing relevance is seeing how deeply similar the two covenants are. Three parallels stand out. First, both covenants are rooted in grace. God called Abraham when he had done nothing to deserve it. He rescued Israel from Egypt before giving them a single law. He chose David, the smallest and weakest in his family. Grace always precedes obedience. God never set up a system where perfect law-keeping earned salvation. His presence was already among his people. The law was not a ladder to climb toward God but a guide for living with the God who had already come down.

Second, in both covenants, obedience is a response to salvation, not a means of earning it. The 10 Commandments begin with, "I am the Lord your God who brought you up out of the land of Egypt." The moral imperatives come after the gracious act. Paul's letters follow the same pattern. Ephesians, Colossians, and Philippians all spend their opening chapters establishing what God has done for his people in Jesus before turning to how those people should live. Third, both covenants carry blessings and curses. In Deuteronomy, obedience meant flourishing in the land, and disobedience meant exile. In the New Testament, the stakes are ratcheted up. Obedience leads to eternal reward, ruling and reigning with Jesus. Disobedience leads to eternal exile from God's presence. The Old Testament is not harsher than the New Testament. As D.A. Carson has observed, both God's love and his justice are intensified in the New Testament. Eternal life replaces life in a temporary land. Eternal separation replaces exile to Babylon. The cross itself is the ultimate display of both realities: God's love poured out in the death of his Son, and God's justice satisfied in that same death.

How Jesus Fulfilled the Law

Jesus' famous declaration in Matthew 5:17 that he came not to abolish the law but to fulfill it is the interpretive key to the entire question. The word "fulfill" is not a synonym for "keep" or "uphold." In Matthew's Gospel, it carries a richer meaning. Matthew 13:52 provides the interpretive lens: every scribe trained for the Kingdom of Heaven is like a master of a house who brings out of his treasure what is new and what is old. The old treasure is the wisdom and story of the Old Testament that has always been there. The new treasure is Jesus himself. When Jesus says he fulfills the law, he is revealing himself as the treasure hidden within it. He is both the person behind the law's character and the perfect embodiment of its intent. He lived as someone obeying the law flawlessly, not as a rigid rule-keeper but as the living expression of God's eternal character in a particular moment in time.

This is visible in how Jesus handled specific laws. With the Sabbath, he did not abolish it but revealed its true heart. The Pharisees had surrounded the Sabbath with hundreds of additional regulations through the Mishnah. Jesus cut through all of it by healing on the Sabbath and asking, "Isn't this person worth more than a donkey you would pull out of a pit?" The Sabbath was never meant to be a day of rigid non-activity. It was a day to enjoy God's good creation and to trust that he would provide. Jesus expanded the Sabbath from one day a week to an everyday posture of the heart. The author of Hebrews confirms this when he writes that a Sabbath rest remains "as long as it is called today." Paul in Colossians 2 says not to let anyone condemn you for how you observe or do not observe the Sabbath. The question is not whether to take a day off each week but whether you are daily trusting God to provide for your salvation, your needs, and your life. With the Passover, Jesus did not destroy the meal but revealed himself as its meaning. During the last Passover meal before his death, he took the bread and the cup and declared, "This meal is about me." What had been a once-a-year celebration of God's rescue from Egypt became a regular celebration, as often as you eat this meal, of an even greater rescue. Everything is ratcheted up, more frequent celebration of a more radical act of grace.

Why Adultery Still Applies and What It Reveals About the Law's Logic

The episode takes up the question of why some laws, like the prohibition of adultery, carry directly into the New Testament with full force. Leviticus 20:10 prescribes death for adultery. Jesus not only upholds this command but intensifies it, teaching that even looking at someone with lust constitutes adultery of the heart. Paul declares that adulterers will not inherit the Kingdom of God, a punishment far more severe than physical stoning. The reason this law endures so directly is that the eternal principle behind it closely mirrors the law itself. God is a covenant-keeping, marriage-loving God. Throughout Scripture, his relationship with his people is described as a marriage, and their unfaithfulness is described as adultery. God wrote his bride's names in the book of life before the foundations of the world and has been eternally faithful to them. Marriage still exists as an institution, and the call to exclusive faithfulness within it still reflects the character of God in a straightforward way. When you remain faithful to your spouse, you image the covenant love of God. When you give your whole self to another person in marriage, you reflect a God who withheld nothing of himself to purchase union with his people. This reframes morality entirely. The law is not a list of restrictions designed to limit joy. It is an invitation to be like the creator of the cosmos. Every law reveals something about who God is and offers human beings the extraordinary privilege of reflecting his character in their daily lives. As Paul writes repeatedly, the law is good, because it makes us like God. And because of Jesus living in his people through the Holy Spirit, there is now new power to actually become the kind of people these laws describe. The appeal of the Gospel is not merely that Jesus saves but that who Jesus can make you into is far greater than who you could make yourself into by following your own desires.

Transcript

Related Resources

Listen to the Leviticus Introduction podcast

Listen Now

Listen to the Should We Obey The Law Today? podcast

Listen Now

Listen to the Leviticus 1-5: Offerings podcast

Listen Now

Listen to the Leviticus 6-10: Priests podcast

Listen Now

Listen to the Leviticus 11-15: Unclean Foods, Diseases, and Emissions podcast

Listen Now

Listen to the Leviticus 16: Day of Atonement podcast

Listen Now

Listen to the Leviticus 17-20: Blood, Sex, and Loving Your Neighbor podcast

Listen Now

Listen to the Leviticus 21-22: A Different Standard For Priests podcast

Listen Now

Listen to the Leviticus 23 and 25: Sabbath, Festivals, and Jubilee podcast

Listen Now

Listen to the Leviticus 24 and 26-27: The Death Penalty, Curses, and Vows podcast

Listen Now
Free videos sent straight to your inbox.